However, FBN Holdings had canceled the EGM and put up the notice on NGX.
In the application, which is yet to be heard before the court adjourned indefinitely, Onagoruwa is seeking the following reliefs: “an order restraining First Bank Holdings and its Board of Directors, their Agents, Employees, Servants, Officers, Directors, Privies or anyone acting on their behalf or at their behest, from conveying, conducting and holding the first respondents’ Extraordinary General Meeting scheduled to hold virtually on the 30th day of April 2024, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive action.
Listed as defendants in the suit are: First Bank Holdings Plc, Alhaji Ahmed Abdullahi, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Julius Omodayo-Owotuga, Non-Executive Director and Mr. Nnamdi Okonkwo, Group Managing Director.
At the resumed hearing of the matter on Wednesday, the lawyer to the defendants, Fred Onuobia (SAN), informed the court that the business of the court is to hear their application challenging its jurisdiction, an application to set aside the Exparte order made by the court, and the petitioner’s contempt application against the defendants.
However, a lawyer to the CBN, Olumide Adebowale, urged the court to stay all proceedings in the suit.
Adebowale told the court that his application was based on the appeal filed against the court’s ruling, which refused to join his client as a party in the suit.
He also told the court that the parties had exchanged briefs, and the Court of Appeal had fixed July 3, 2024, for the appeal hearing.
He, therefore, urged the court to adjourn the matter ‘sine die’ till the determination of his appeal.
In response, counsel to the petitioner, Adesoji Adedoyin, opposed the submission of the CBN’s counsel on the ground that there are contempt proceedings against all the defendants.
He told the court that the contempt proceedings had to do with the court’s order granted on July 15, 2022, which all the defendants allegedly disobeyed.
Onuobia, in his only response, told the court that he did not oppose the CBN’s application for adjournment.
He said if the court proceeds to hear the petitioner’s contempt application, he will equally urge the court to listen to his application challenging its jurisdiction.
In a short ruling, Justice Aluko held that since an appeal is before the Court of Appeal, the best thing to do is to stay further proceedings to await the verdict of the upper court.
Justice Aluko, consequently, adjourned the matter sine die.
